The privilege of living in the US is that each of us has the freedom to speak our minds. Some use this freedom of speech to promote unity, equity, and other ideals that are the hallmark of the nation’s ideals. The recent publication of Adios America by Ann Coulter and the opinions expressed on Mexico and Mexicans by Donald Trump illustrate how freedom of speech can be used to undermine our most cherished beliefs in a pluralistic society. For the past 30 years, Rush Limbaugh has used his media businesses to further the cause of bigots, homophobes, and to reinforce stereotypes and bias. One consequence of all three of these individuals’ activities is that they have amassed enormous money endorsing products, speaking at events, creating businesses and much more.
The words of Coulter, Trump, and Limbaugh have other consequences.
Their words impact the quality of life for millions of hard working people of color, immigrants, LGBT families, and women. Their ideas about the immigrants who continue to build this nation day by day make it harder for them to find work, for their children to walk with pride, and for some to be denied basic human rights. Their ability to use the media to fuel bigotry can even inspire terrorists to take the lives of innocent people.
The commercial sponsorships of Coulter, Trump and Limbaugh should be seen by any corporation as a liability for which every Board member and senior executive must address as a matter of governance and risk management. It is only a matter of time that someone somehow will find a way to form a class action suit that links the activities of these individuals to very clear financial and emotional harm amassed among a class of people who continue to be maligned by Coulter, Trump and Lumbaugh. We live in the era of big data and it would be interesting to link their actions to hate crimes across the country.
The nation’s most watched media outlet—Univision-- has demonstrated the leadership necessary for corporate social responsibility of the highest order: furthering the ideal of pluralism. Univision has pulled out of Trump’s commercial ventures. This should serve as an example to all corporations to review sponsorships with any individual who promotes bias, sexism, homophobia, and bigotry.
None of these individuals would be in the position to promote their ideas were it not for the money to do so. And yet, if your company continues to pay for commercials on their websites or sponsors their media appearance, you are furthering the opportunity of people who profit from hate and injustice. This ability to fund spokespeople for divisiveness will not continue without some consequence.
The list of supporters for Coulter, Limbaugh, and Trump are all available in different postings across the internet. You know you are. People will learn what you support. The time is now to take note of how companies have had to step up on their moral compass and do the right thing. The diversity of your customers, investors and other stakeholders requires that you act—if you cannot be motivated by a moral compass, you should be clear about your bottom line.
Anyone who identifies with being liberal, progressive, or democrat is looking at last nights elections with a deep sense of doom. The Republicans own the House and Senate. The last two years of President Obama's term will not just be lame--they will be downright paralizing. Even if he uses his executive orders to keep moving forward on immigration and protecting healthcare reform, I'm not expecting a lot of progress forward on the issues that continue to undermine the potential of our nation.
My take is that the lack of unity among Republicans themselves will become all the more apparent and their lack of relevance with the growing Latino and Asian communities across the country will undermine what ever momentum they want to create for the 2016 elections. Even though they elected the first African American female senator in Utah and even if they have a few outspoken Latinos--the communities of color have a healthy dose of skepticism about the degree to which inclusion runs deep in the heart of the GOP.
What this means is that by the time 2016 rolls on, another set of disappointments will set off another swing of the pendulum and people will find themselves reacting to a different set of circumstances that call for change. I can only imagine that Hilary sees this as a great opportunity!
Mujeres there is a lot of advice for the taking these days!
It isn’t just coming from your friends and family — or me! The internet has given birth to an endless number of places to get advice. Since publishing on Facebook, Blogger and LinkedIn has become so easy to do — anyone can dole out their own words of wisdom. It’s one of the best and worst features of surfing the web.
We all seek out ideas and information to help with anything from buying the latest fashion trends to buying a car. And, of course our own culture places a high value on sage advice for the young and old. Jóvenes y viejos, todos necesitamos consejos. (Young and old, we all need advice)
But what advice is right for you on the big issues for your life — career, health, family? How do you weed through it all?
My bias is to look carefully for advice that comes from a reputable source and that there is some research linked to the advice. The other filter to apply when you read advice is to ask whether it applies to your specific circumstance.
Is it for your stage of career? Is it for your industry? Is it a fit for your personal style?
One of my favorite examples of the challenges of taking career advice not meant for you was started by a book with the clever title, Never Check Your Email First Thing in the Morning by Julie Morgenstern. Her suggestion has been repeated in a wide range of other lists with equally compelling titles: The Top 10 Things Productive People Do, The Top 10 Ways Happy People Start Their Day.
In working with young people–and even not so young who are part of virtual global teams– this mantra of not checking email early in the day is seriously problematic.
If you are on a global team it may be helpful to recognize that your 6 am is someone’s 9 am or 2pm and you may just have something in your inbox that became urgent 3 or 6 hours ago while you were sleeping.
If you are a senior executive or you have the luxury of having administrative support, you may not need to check your email because chances are someone else checks your email for you. I understand the intent of Morgenstern’s original work and even Morgenstern admonishes that everyone needs to create their owntime map to manage what works for them.
My advice: check your email early enough to be on top of what’s happening for your team and your customers. Make the best decision on what needs a response now or later in the day — your decision to answer an email at 5:30 am rests on the value you bring to your team or meeting your customer’s expectations.
There are no hard or fast rules that meet every situation.
Your career and the demands of your work-life are only known to you. Unless you are working directly with a mentor or coach that knows your unique circumstances, take time to assess what advice truly is right for you. Anything that gives you an absolute rule to follow may be more about drawing attention than truly advice meant for everyone reading.